<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Power Pop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://otherephemera.com/2008/07/18/on-power-pop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://otherephemera.com/2008/07/18/on-power-pop/</link>
	<description>random musings from our nation's capital</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks about Pavement</title>
		<link>http://otherephemera.com/2008/07/18/on-power-pop/#comment-88097</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Pavement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://otherephemera.com/?p=25#comment-88097</guid>
		<description>[...] - bookmarked by 3 members originally found by rarnedo on 2008-07-22  On Power Pop  http://otherephemera.com/2008/07/18/on-power-pop/ - bookmarked by 2 members originally found by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] - bookmarked by 3 members originally found by rarnedo on 2008-07-22  On Power Pop  <a href="http://otherephemera.com/2008/07/18/on-power-pop/" rel="nofollow">http://otherephemera.com/2008/07/18/on-power-pop/</a> - bookmarked by 2 members originally found by [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jet Age Eric</title>
		<link>http://otherephemera.com/2008/07/18/on-power-pop/#comment-88095</link>
		<dc:creator>Jet Age Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://otherephemera.com/?p=25#comment-88095</guid>
		<description>I think you're working with a more trad. definition of power pop (rickenbackers, elaborate harmonies, overt Beatles influences).  It's become apparent to me that the term is now intended to encompass upbeat pop that's--musically--fairly one dimensional (ballads aside), and that's the definition at play in this review.  

Ironically, Stephen D is the guy who wrote the big Fleet Foxes EP review for Pitchfork.  I know him, and he's nothing if not a THOUGHTFUL guy.  I'd guess that his point was that JO have their roots in music that is not particularly "deep," and thus, given the source, the music has limited appeal (it's catchy but not moving or thought provoking), or appeals to a limited aesthetic (upbeat, never moody).  

I don't know if I LIKE that the definition of power pop has broadened, but at this point I think there's a lot of textual evidence to suggest that it has.  

On another note, I was pleased to see the mighty Fred Mills got a shout out in an earlier post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re working with a more trad. definition of power pop (rickenbackers, elaborate harmonies, overt Beatles influences).  It&#8217;s become apparent to me that the term is now intended to encompass upbeat pop that&#8217;s&#8211;musically&#8211;fairly one dimensional (ballads aside), and that&#8217;s the definition at play in this review.  </p>
<p>Ironically, Stephen D is the guy who wrote the big Fleet Foxes EP review for Pitchfork.  I know him, and he&#8217;s nothing if not a THOUGHTFUL guy.  I&#8217;d guess that his point was that JO have their roots in music that is not particularly &#8220;deep,&#8221; and thus, given the source, the music has limited appeal (it&#8217;s catchy but not moving or thought provoking), or appeals to a limited aesthetic (upbeat, never moody).  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if I LIKE that the definition of power pop has broadened, but at this point I think there&#8217;s a lot of textual evidence to suggest that it has.  </p>
<p>On another note, I was pleased to see the mighty Fred Mills got a shout out in an earlier post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
